Skip to main content

Slides I use to discuss the moral justification of killing in war

Several folks have asked if I have a paper or presentation I can share that would help them lead a discussion with their Soldiers on the moral justification of killing in war.
I have intended for months to write a concise paper, or at least put notes to the slides, but alas I haven't. So, I post these slides, knowing full well that bullets don't tell the whole story...but I hope that these are at least helpful. Talking openly about the morality of killing with our Soldiers accomplishes a lot on its own. I know that someone out there will take this discussion to the next level. Please share back with me the insights you discover.














Comments

Anonymous said…
Thank you for the slides. I am a lifelong civilian, and so am not in your target audience. Still, I found your discussion points to be worthwhile. I particularly like the 'spectrum' of threats on Slide 8. Thanks again.
Anonymous said…
Sir,

Is there any way I could get a copy of these slides? I'd like to show them to my Marines.

respectfully,
Capt Susan Murphy
A Co
Marine Wing Communications Squadron 48
Great Lakes IL
susan.murphy@usmc.mil
Pete said…
Slides are on the way to your email, Capt. Murphy.
Anonymous said…
Hello Pete,

I agree with you all the way,but I have to disagree with one point of your slide. You wrote "humanize" the Afghani/Iraqi people. This is unfair to say.
Pete said…
Anon:
What the bulllet means is that we should take actions to help our Soldiers appreciate that the local people are people. In a counterinsurgency fight in which the enemy wears civilian clothing snd does its best to mix into the population, it's easy to begin to objectivize and hate the local people. Good leaders take action--things like set up events to play soccer with the local men, or have Soldiers eat dinners with local families--to connect their Soldiers with the people, thus reminding the Soldiers of their shared humanity.
Anonymous said…
Okay thanks man for clearing that up.
Anonymous said…
Pete,

I am a high schooler in the middle of writing an essay that involves your point of view. My class has been on the topic of the morality of war-time killing for several months now and i just want to thank you for the well writen essays that i have been citing from your blog.
Thanks again.

-Student
Pete said…
"Student":

I'm happy to hear that you find this site meaningful and helpful. I'd love to see your essay; I could provide feedback if you want. You can email me at pgkilner_at_gmail_dot_com.
Anonymous said…
Pete,

Sorry for such a long delay, I will email it soon.
Thanks for replying.

-student
Sonny Moon said…
The amateur stick-figure artwork undermines your argument.

Popular posts from this blog

Moral justification for killing in war

This is my latest version of laying out the argument. Feedback is welcomed!


A moral justification for killing in war
By Pete Kilner, 2009


Introduction:
The Army performs many of the same functions as civilian organizations, yet there is one absolutely unique and defining characteristic of our profession—we are organized, equipped and trained to kill people. As company-level leaders, we recruit patriotic young Americans to kill; equip them to kill; train them to kill; develop and issue orders for them to kill; issue fire commands for them to kill; and commend them for killing enemies of our country. We perform our duties well, and the American people sleep safely at night. However, we as a profession generally do not provide our soldiers with an explanation for why it is morally right for them to kill in combat. Consequently, many of the soldiers entrusted to our care suffer needless guilt after killing in war.
The purpose of this article is to offer you a tool—an explanation for the morali…

War can be an Experience of both Heaven and Hell

Many combat veterans have a love/hate relationship with their wartime experiences. They love the profound sense of purpose that their lives had; they hate the senseless evil that necessitated the war. They love the unity they experienced with their fellow soldiers; they hate the destruction they witnessed and sometimes unleashed.
Wars are visible, political conflicts that spawn invisible, moral conflicts within those who fight them.What combat veteran doesn’t feel pride and exhilaration, disgust and anger?That’s a volatile brew of emotions—a cauldron that veterans must recognize and reconcile in order to integrate their wartime experiences into their personal life narratives.
I am a career Army officer who embedded with combat units and interviewed hundreds of soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan over multiple deployments. I am also a Christian. In the course of my own struggle to integrate my identity as a soldier with my larger identity as a Christian, I gained an insight—one informed by …

Killing enemy combatants--a justification

Introduction
The profession of arms talks about ‘morality and war’ using legal terms and concepts. For example, we justify our decision to deploy and fight when the President orders us because we signed a contract to obey the officers appointed over us. Similarly, we consider ourselves blameless when we kill enemy combatants as long as we do not violate the laws of war or the rules of engagement in doing so. These legal rules are so important to our professional identity that all soldiers receive instruction on the laws of war in basic combat training and then annually thereafter, and soldiers at war review the rules of engagement much more often, sometimes daily.

Not everyone in our society, however, accepts these legal answers to moral questions. War pacifists are people who believe that war is morally unjustifiable. They claim that soldiers are morally wrong to participate in war and to kill other human beings, regardless of what’s legally permissible at the time.

Currently, we milita…