There have been a bunch of articles lately, especially in the Army Times, about actions the Army is taking to address the problem of PTSD among Soldiers. I'm a little concerned to hear the Army place so much emphasis on the role of combat-stress teams (CSTs), which are in-country teams of uniformed mental-health professionals who counsel Soldiers after critical events (e.g., firefights).
By many accounts, CSTs are very effective at getting Soldiers "back into the fight." So, it seems that CSTs address what's been called "shell shock" and "battle fatigue" in previous wars.
But, I wonder: is the treatment that gets Soldiers back to being Soldiers the same that's required to help Soldiers re-integrate as civilians? After all, PTSD isn't about not being able to get back into the fight; it's about not being able to leave the fight behind.
Recent reports indicate that symptoms of PTSD are more common in the follow-up screenings done 3-4 months after re-deployment than they are in the screenings done at redeployment. PTSD seems to be correlate positively to having time to reflect upon the things experienced in battle. What can we do for Soldiers after they have re-deployed and they begin serious reflections?
I am a retired Army officer who believes in the moral standing of the profession of arms, yet recognizes its shortcomings. I served in the Army from 1984-2017, mostly in the infantry and on the faculty at West Point. As a researcher of combat leadership and ethics, I interviewed hundreds of Army leaders in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2003-2011. Welcome to this online space for thinking about war, morality, and the profession of arms. Follow me @combat_ethics
War can be an Experience of both Heaven and Hell
Many combat veterans have a love/hate relationship with their wartime experiences. They love the profound sense of purpose that their liv...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
This is my latest version of laying out the argument. Feedback is welcomed! A moral justification for killing in war By Pete Kilner, 2009 In...
-
Among my statements that were included in the film "Soldiers of Conscience," my thought experiment about the Good Samaritan has ev...
-
Killing in War: a Rights-based Justification Why killing enemy combatants is morally justified BLUF: When we kill enemy combatants, we are n...
-
I posted this on the POV.org blog in response to viewers of Soldiers of Conscience praising the featured conscientious objectors' courag...
-
Life is funny. On the day that I leave my regular work (at a desk) and begin the process of deploying to Afghanistan, the BBC runs an artic...
2 comments:
Pete,
Last I was briefed 1AD experienced the most problems with Combat Related Stress/PTSD at about the 6-12 months back mark. It seems that the re-integration into society cycle will normally complete itself around that time.
I am not sure about the veracity of the above claim, just know what happened here.
As for the effectiveness of the CSTs. They came and gave us a brief, and I even had some Troopers talk to them. Those Troopers that were willing to talk about it said they felt better, but it was not a cure-all.
Marshall Tway
Pete:
I am thankful that you are an instructor at West Point. The questions you pose here are important to the future of so many soldiers, their families and friends. I have observed a pre-deployment training program for mental health personnel and can see that this is an ongoing problem without consensus. I am at UPenn this semester writing a bioethics paper on just such a topic and the role of both the military and local civil society in re-integration support.
Nancy
nanl@sp2.upenn.edu
Post a Comment